Published
March 22, 2012 | FoxNews.com
"Obviously
we wish Solyndra hadn't gone bankrupt. Part of the reason they did was the
Chinese were subsidizing their solar industry and flooding the market in ways
Solyndra couldn't compete. But understand, this was not our program per
se."
--
President Obama talking to National Public Radio's "Marketplace."
President
Obama is on a swing-state campaign blitz this week, looking to stifle voter
anger over high energy prices. While the White House is casting the trip as an effort to
lay out Obama's vision for future energy abundance, much of the message is
aimed at reducing the supply of blame.
Today,
for example, Obama will speak in Cushing, Okla., the pipeline capital of the
planet, to point out that while he has blocked a pipeline to bring Canadian oil
to the Gulf of Mexico, he is allowing other domestic pipelines
to be built.
The
pipeline to Canada, the Keystone XL, is a political winner. Polls
consistently show Americans favor its construction and Republicans have been
hammering the president for months for his obstruction of the project.
Obama
seems to be in the midst of a creeping climb-down on the subject, but he has to
move slowly.
Remember,
many liberals dislike the project because it would provide so much oil to
gasoline refineries. The cheaper gas is for American drivers, the more gasoline
they will use. Environmentalists believe all this driving is causing the
earth's atmosphere to become dangerously warm.
Obama,
who is a long-time crusader against global warming, has suffered politically
for his opposition to the pipeline. Global warming has faded as a concern for
voters amid a lengthy economic disruption and with new doubts about the most
alarming claims made by carbon hawks. With gasoline prices more than twice as
high as they were when Obama took office, consumers are far less indulgent of
Obama's environmental policies.
The
president's point in Cushing is that while he won't allow the top of the
pipeline to go where the oil is, he has chosen not to block pipeline expansions
at the southern end. This, of course, makes folks in the energy business
furious. To have the president demanding credit for not blocking domestic
pipeline upgrades is galling to them. They need executive blessing to cross the
international border with Canada, but for domestic jobs they mostly just need
Obama not to interfere and allow the permitting process to work as in the past.
The
Obama campaign and White House have both made clear that the part of the
pipeline that goes to the oil may yet be approved. The problem, they say, is
that Republicans hurried the process. Again, Obama is seeking bipartisan blame.
When
builders apply again with a new proposal, says Team Obama, the State Department may find new wisdom in their
proposal and allow it to proceed.
This
is how general elections change things. For the past seven months, Obama has
been looking to pacify his sometimes-crabby political base. For the next seven
months, Obama will be looking for ways to convince moderates that he really
isn't as liberal as they think. This is the way in which Keystone can go from
bad to good.
This
week's campaign swing is Obama's effort to show moderates that he isn't really
so radical on energy. Some of Obama's biggest political missteps surround energy policy, particularly his effort to impose
global warming fees and the massive outlays given to Democratic allies for
dubious green energy projects.
Obama's
first stop was in must-win Nevada, where he defended subsidies for solar
energy, a tricky subject given the high-profile debacle at Solyndra, a pet
project of big Obama donors that got a presidential visit and lots of public
help.
While
making his push for solar, Obama explained to a reporter for National Public
Radio that the blame for Solyndra was bipartisan and not the fault of the Obama
Democrats "per se."
"Congress,
Democrats and Republicans, put together a loan guarantee program because they
understood historically that when you get new industries, it's easy to get
money for new startups," Obama said. "But if you want to take them to
scale, often there is a lot of risk involved and what the loan guarantee
program was designed to do was to help start-up companies get to scale."
The
2009 stimulus package that provided the funding for a loan of $527 million for
Solyndra, which subsequently defaulted, got zero Republican votes in the House
and three Republican votes in the Senate -- Maine Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins and former Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter, who switched parties two months after
the vote. There was no Republican input on the structuring of the energy loan
program and the specific loan to Solyndra was a Democratic job from start to
finish.
It's
true that there has been bipartisan support for the Federal Financing Bank
since before its founding in 1973. Republicans have increasingly come to
dislike the idea of giving the government power to loan money to private
enterprises -- "picking winners and losers" -- because of a growing
opposition to crony capitalism and how it perverts politics and the
marketplace. But crony capitalism was once very, very popular among moderate
Republicans who cherished "public-private partnerships" and other
hidey-holes for public funds.
But
to suggest that Solyndra, the pet project of a major Obama backer, George
Kaiser, was somehow a bipartisan failure because Rockefeller Republicans like
the idea of using other people's money to start businesses is a little
far-fetched. That would be like the driver at fault in a car crash arguing that
roads enjoy widespread public support and crashes are inevitable: "While
my car may have collided with yours, surely we can all agree that
infrastructure is vital to America."
Solyndra
was a debacle even if you like the idea of government giving money to preferred
businesses: donor influence, ignored warnings, poor judgment, bad timing.
Solyndra
made the opponents of "picking winners and losers" jobs too easy.
Here, in one case, is everything the small-government conservatives have
argued. Borrowing money from China to try to match Chinese subsidies for that
country's solar sector is a tough enough sell. Doing so in a way that might
enrich political benefactors is far worse.
Friday
is the second birthday of the president's largest lingering liability from his
term: a health law that most voters think will be expensive, disruptive and
ineffective. The Supreme Court begins several days of arguments on
the law, thought to be unconstitutional by most Americans, on Monday.
The
process will remind moderate voters of their frustrations with Obama and his
policies in a big way. It's unfortunate for the president that the health law
revival comes amid voter anger with his energy policies, and this campaign trip
is an effort to reduce his liabilities on energy before Americans spend several
days talking about the law they dislike that also happens to be Obama's most
significant accomplishment.
If
Obama can't knock down the perception that he is too liberal, events will
compound quickly and leave him unable to pull of a new, more centrist posture.
No comments:
Post a Comment